DSBA Web Page Declarer Problem of the Month

July, 1999


This month's hand is from the first session of our recent DSBA Charity Pairs tournament.

Dealer: North
Vulnerable: N-S

 

NORTH
SK Q T 9 6
HK J 5 2
DQ T 3
C5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOUTH
SA J 4
HA T 4 3
DA 5 4
CK Q J

 

AUCTION

NORTH

EAST

SOUTH

WEST

1 S

Pass

4NT

Pass

5 C

Pass

6NT

Pass

Pass

Pass


West leads the C8. East wins the CA and returns the C3, West following with the C4. Plan the play.


Solution



It appears that you need four heart tricks to make your slam, so the first order of business is to figure out whom to play for the HQ. This may seem like a toss-up, but it is far from that; there are several clues that suggest playing West for the HQ is superior to playing East for the HQ. To reach that conclusion, you must follow this sequence of deductions:

1) Both opponents know from the auction that the declaring side is missing an ace. This is a consequence of the fact that South did not bid 5NT to ask for kings (asking for kings does NOT necessarily mean that YOU will be able to bid a grand if you hear the right response; rather, it also guarantees possession of all 4 aces so that PARTNER can bid a grand when he holds the right hand).

2) Since West knows an ace is missing, he will not lead from an unsupported honor in hearts, diamonds, or clubs, because he does not expect to find any help there from partner. He will be looking for a safe lead.

3) Since West DID make a safe lead, HE IS MORE LIKELY TO HOLD ANY MISSING HONORS THAN EAST. The reason for this is restricted choice. If West has none of the missing honors, he is equally likely to lead any suit. However, when he has one (or more) missing honor, the likelihood of a safe club lead increases because he is unable to lead the suit with the honor. To make this as clear as possible, consider the case where West holds xxx Qxxx Kxx 8xx. Using the logic above, West will lead a club 50% of the time when holding this hand (not 25%). If the hand were Qxx Qxxx Qxx 8xx (obviously not possible here, since North holds the SQ), the likelihood of a club lead increases to 100%.

So, suppose West has the HQ. The only thing that could go wrong is if hearts break poorly. But this can be overcome assuming West also has the DK. You must time the play perfectly, though, to give yourself the best chance AND to assure only a one-trick set should the heart finesse fail (which could be critical at pairs, since many will bid to a slam here).

Win the club (pitching a diamond), cash the HA and finesse the HJ. When it holds, if East follows, claim. If East shows out, cash all of dummy's spades (pitching two diamonds), and the cross back to the DA to reach the following ending (South to lead):

 

NORTH
S---
HK 5
DQ
C---

 

SOUTH
S---
HT 4
D---
CQ

 

In the above ending, West can keep two hearts and the DK. When you cash the DQ, he is squeezed in the reds.

The full deal:

 

NORTH
SK Q T 9 6
HK J 5 2
DQ T 3
C5

WEST
S7 5
HQ 9 8 7
DK J 7
C8 7 6 4

 

EAST
S8 3 2
H6
D9 8 6 2
CA T 9 3 2

 

SOUTH
SA J 4
HA T 4 3
DA 5 4
CK Q J

 

Two final notes: Perhaps the two most interesting points to this hand are details which did not occur in practice. The first is to note that the hand can still be made if East has the DK and West has the DJ. Win the second club (pitching a diamond), cash all of the spades (pitching a diamond and a heart), and lead the DQ!! East must cover (or it is the 12th trick), and then the DT becomes the diamond threat in the red-suit squeeze against West. This is called a "transfered menace". However, declarer should NOT play the hand this way, for the same reason that he SHOULD take the recommended line. Just as it is more likely that West holds the HQ because of the lead, it is also more likely that he holds the DK, so the recommended line is preferable.
The second interesting point is to follow the play if East does NOT win the first club trick. Sometimes, such a defense will prevail. On this deal, however, the declarer can always succeed double-dummy. The play is complex, but all variations essentially lead to West being squeezed, either as above, or "without the count" (in these variations, West is squeezed out of his clubs, and then is endplayed in one red suit to concede the 12th trick in the other red suit).

Thanks to Pete Filandro of Smyrna, DE, for his analysis of this month's hand.

Click here to send questions or comments regarding this month's hand.

Back to the DSBA Features Page