DSBA Home Page DSBA Home Page DSBA Club Schedule DSBA State Tournaments ACBL Sectionals DSBA Special Events DSBA Masterpoint Achievers Talleyville Results Bid Contest Play Problems E-Mail Registry The Dummy Feedback DSBA info on-line Search

DSBA Web Site Banner

DSBA 3rd Quarter 2002 Bidding Contest Results!
Edited by Jess Stuart

PANELIST SCORES

SCORE

NAME

430

Pete Filandro

420

Rick Rowland

420

Jeff Ruben

400

Dave Smith

380

Robert Grover


TOP SOLVERS

PLACE

SCORE

NAME

1

440

Randy Berseth

2

410

Bill Erwin

Manuel Paulo

4

400

Lois Stuar

Maggie Shellenberger

6

390

Don Woodhouse

Michael Lucy

Leif Lundberg

Amelio Silvestri

10

380

Eric Luft


Hand 1:

IMPs QT54 Auction: West North East South
Vul: None AJ62 - - 1 Double
Dlr: East 4 1 2 4 ?
You are: S AKQ2        

Action

Score

Votes(Panel)

Votes(Solvers)

5 NT

100

1

4

Pass

90

-

1

4 NT

80

1

5

5

60

-

11

5

50

1

1

5

50

1

1

5

40

-

1

6

30

-

2

Double

20

1

17

6

20

0

2

Four of the five panelists think a slam is likely, but they chose four different bids to get there. The winning bid, 5 NT, asks partner to pick a heart or club slam without implying first round control in the opponents' suits, as the cue bids would do.

Pete Filandro: 5 NT. In BWS, 2 spades is a game force and 5 NT is "pick a slam" (if it cannot be quantitative or the grand slam force). Perfect! There are not enough points for partner's game force if he has even one spade. He must have void KQxxx ?xx xxxxx with about 4 points in diamonds. If it's the KJ he bids 6 hearts and I pass. If he has Axx he cues 6 diamonds and I bid 7 hearts.

Jeff Ruben: 4 NT. Regular Blackwood since we have not agreed on a suit. I assume partner has a heart-club 2-suiter, with longer clubs (otherwise he would have just bid some number of hearts), something like: void KQxxx xx Jxxxxx. My bid shows slam interest, and I hope partner will get the message and jump with a void in spades. I will pass 5 clubs.

Since partner's cue bid is game forcing, he must bid or double over a pass of the opponents' 4 spades. Passing, like the 5 NT "pick a slam" bid has the advantage of getting to a slam in our best suit. Partner may have had too good a hand to just jump to game and may have elected to cue bid with a strong one-suiter, perhaps: x KQxxxx AQxx xx, or x KQ Axx JTxxxxx. By not accommodating these possibilities, the unilateral, conservative 5 hearts or 5 clubs and the unilateral, aggressive 6 hearts or 6 clubs don't score as well.


Hand 2:

IMPs A6 Auction: West North East South
Vul: Both - 1 1 Pass ?
Dlr: West AT97643        
You are: S A852        

Action

Score

Votes(Panel)

Votes(Solvers)

1 NT

100

3

12

Pass

80

2

10

2

60

-

7

2 NT

50

-

3

2

40

-

12

3 NT

30

-

1

I had a partner long ago who played his hands very well but was timid in bidding, especially without as fit. Our results improved when we developed the "ten point rule", which dictated a partner had to bid something if he had ten points more than indicated in the auction so far. This hand is a good application of the "ten point rule". Each bid has serious flaws, but the natural 1 NT seems to distort the hand less than the others.

Robert Grover (with Jeff Ruben similarly): 1 NT. I hate this bid with a void in partner's suit. Pass cannot be right. 2 NT is worse than 1 NT; too much can go wrong. If partner rebids only 2 hearts, he can play there.

Kurt Kilhefner adds: 1 NT. Hoping something good develops, rather than a disaster. How disappointed can partner be with my three Aces?

Rick Rowland: Pass. Not going out on a limb here. Only alternative is some number of NT, which I fear will get some bigger number of hearts. Might miss a NT game on occasion, but will always get a partscore plus.

Michael Lucy: 2. ARGGGHHH (why me?). I don't like it , however this is the least of all evils in my opinion.


Hand 3:

IMPs 94 Auction: West North East South
Vul: None A532 - - 1 Pass
Dlr: East J754 2 2 Pass Pass
You are: S 985 3 Double Pass ?

Action

Score

Votes(Panel)

Votes(Solvers)

3

100

2

4

Pass

90

1

13

3

80

-

4

3

70

2

19

4

40

-

1

4

30

-

1

4

20

-

3

Partner has a good hand with a pattern of: 6-3-3-1, 5-3-3-2, 5-4-3-1, 5-3-4-1, or such. How do you cater to these possibilities most effectively?

Rick Rowland: 3 . What inference should be taken from the fact that partner didn't double the first time? His spades are too good. Maybe he's only 3-3 in the red suits. His spades are too long (6-4-3-0 or 6-3-3-1). Three of any suit could be right, but my guess is spades.

Robert Grover: Pass. Not sure that game is right. If game makes, they are going down enough to compensate. Best bet for a plus is to sit for the double and contribute my trick.

Don Woodhouse: Pass. If pard was sure he wanted to play in spades he would not be doubling. I don't mind missing a heart partial and anyway he could be 5-3-4-1 or something.

If you don't take the double out to spades, do you chose hearts or diamonds? I think partner might be more inclined to double the first time with 5-4-3-1 and to overcall spades, then double later with 5-3-4-1. Two panelists don't agree, though.

Pete Filandro (with Jeff Ruben similarly): 3 . First, level. Should I bid 4? No. Partner cannot have the 20+ needed for game because he started with an overcall. Next, suit. If pard is 5-4-4-0 or 5-4-3-1, hearts is right. If he is 5-3-4-1, he will often bid 3 diamonds. I think a second suit in this auction should show 5.


Hand 4:

Matchpoints K93 Auction: West North East South
Vul: None AJT4 - 1 Pass 1
Dlr: North 74 2 2 Pass ?
You are: S 9653

Bidding Note:By partnership agreement, 2NT would have been natural and non-forcing.

Action

Score

Votes(Panel)

Votes(Solvers)

3

100

2

9

3

80

3

10

3

70

-

7

Pass

50

-

8

2 NT

40

-

10

4

20

-

1

Partner's bidding shows a good hand with more diamonds than spades. There's a good case to be made for keeping the bidding open with a choice that rates to be the best combined trump fit, 3 diamonds.

Rick Rowland (with Dave Smith similarly): 3 . I'm looking to give partner some room to describe his hand. If he bids 3 hearts or 3 spades, I'll bid 4. If he bids 3 NT, I am happy to pass. If he bids 4 diamonds, I'll raise to 5. If he passes, that's probably where we belong.

Jeff Ruben (with Pete Filandro and Robert Grover similarly): 3 . Too much to pass and I do not want to raise spades immediately lest partner think I have 4-card support. Over 3 diamonds I will bid 3 spades. Over 3 spades, I will raise. I will pass 3 NT.

Randy Berseth: 3 . I have game going values but no clear direction. Partner's next bid should clarify in which strain we should be playing.


Hand 5:

Matchpoints 6543 Auction: West North East South
Vul: N-S KJ8 - - - 1
Dlr: South AKQJ43 Pass 1 2 ?
You are: S -        

Bidding Note: Your partner refuses to play support doubles!

Action

Score

Votes(Panel)

Votes(Solvers)

3

100

1

6

3

90

2

10

2

80

1

6

2

70

-

8

2

60

1

3

3

50

-

3

4

40

-

2

4

30

-

2

Double

20

-

4

3

10

-

1

Pete Filandro: 3 . I can make a very descriptive yet non-forcing bid. 3 NT is our most likely game. If pard has values but no club stopper, he can bid a natural 3 hearts or 3 spades so our 8-card major fit can be located.

Jeff Ruben: 3 . Since all partner needs for a grand is AQxxx of hearts and the Ace of spades, I had better make a forcing bid and 3 clubs stands out. I will pass 3 NT but cue bid 4 clubs over anything else.

Barry Gorski: 2 . Three clubs or three diamonds will likely lose the spade suit and invite 3 NT which may be inferior to either hearts or spades. Two spades shows my strength (which improved due to the club overcall) and gives more flexibility to later bidding.