
DSBA Bidding Contest Results! - 1st Quarter 2000
| Place | Score | Name |
| 1 | 500 | Paul Amer |
| Jeff Ruben | ||
| 3 | 470 | Soley Kristjansdottir |
| 4 | 435 | Greg Burch |
| Andrew Kaufman | ||
| 6 | 430 | Rick Rowland |
| 7 | 425 | Kurt Engleman |
| 8 | 420 | Randy Berseth |
| Forrest Pilgrim | ||
| 10 | 410 | Pete Filandro |
| Hand 1: | 53 |
Auction: | North | East | South | West |
| Vul: None | AKQJ76 |
2![]() |
3![]() |
3![]() |
? | |
| Dlr: North | AT2 |
|||||
| You are: W | K7 |
| Bid | Frequency | Score |
5 ![]() |
12 | 100 |
4 ![]() |
2 | 20 |
5 ![]() |
0 | 20 |
| 4 NT | 2 | 15 |
4 ![]() |
1 | 15 |
6 ![]() |
0 | 15 |
6 ![]() |
1 | 10 |
Rick Rowland: 5
seems like the only
bid that logically moves toward slam. On this auction, it must be natural
and asking about spade control.
| Hand 2: | 6 |
Auction: | North | East | South | West |
| Vul: N-S | AKT876 |
- | 1![]() |
Pass | Pass | |
| Dlr: East | AQ86 |
? | ||||
| You are: N | A3 |
| Bid | Frequency | Score |
| Double | 13 | 100 |
2 ![]() |
0 | 90 |
1 ![]() |
1 | 45 |
3 ![]() |
2 | 35 |
4 ![]() |
1 | 25 |
2 ![]() |
1 | 0 |
Jeff Ruben: 2
would be too unilateral; the best
spot could be in diamonds. I have enough to bid hearts over a spade response.
Pete Filandro: Jumps in the passout seat are intermediate, not weak. If partner can't invite there is no game. If we double partner could embarrass us in spades.
Greg Burch: I know... the doublers are all saying "hey, wait, partner can't
bid 4
over the double: he would have preempted or overcalled."
The problem with that logic is two-fold... first, you are red vs. white, so the overcall
constraints are somewhat more stringent... but the main problem is that they are
assuming that partner's next bid will come over a "pass" by the opener. What will
partner do when he has
J98xxx
Qx
KJxx
x or the like, and lefty bids
3
? Doesn't his
hand grow up? I think 3
gives you the best of all worlds.
| Hand 3: | A |
Auction: | North | East | South | West |
| Vul: E-W | J94 |
- | - | 1![]() |
Pass | |
| Dlr: South | A85 |
1![]() |
Pass | 2![]() |
Pass | |
| You are: S | A98532 |
2 1 |
Pass | ? |
Bidding Note:
1New Minor Forcing
| Bid | Frequency | Score |
| 2 NT | 8 | 100 |
3 ![]() |
4 | 70 |
3 ![]() |
3 | 30 |
2 ![]() |
2 | 15 |
Jeff Ruben: Better to lie (slightly) about the heart stopper than to bid that club suit again.
Rick Rowland: Which lie to tell? Seems like rebidding the ugly club suit is better than lying about the heart stopper and spade length with 2NT.
| Hand 4: | A4 |
Auction: | North | East | South | West |
| Vul: Both | KQ3 |
- | - | - | 1![]() | |
| Dlr: West | - |
Pass | 1![]() |
Pass | ? | |
| You are: W | AQJT9763 |
| Bid | Frequency | Score |
2 ![]() |
8 | 100 |
| 3 NT | 1 | 80 |
2 ![]() |
1 | 70 |
3 ![]() |
2 | 65 |
5 ![]() |
0 | 50 |
4 ![]() |
3 | 30 |
1 ![]() |
1 | 0 |
3 ![]() |
1 | 0 |
Randy Berseth: This is a good reason to play a big club system.
Andy Kaufman: This is a very powerful offensive hand and the reverse
describes this without taking up too much bidding space... This is at least a
9 trick hand and so too good for 3
.
Rick Rowland: We need to invent a reverse. 2
has the technical advantage that it may induce a heart lead where you have a chance
at two stoppers if you end up in no trump.
Moderator: Some contestants insisted this was a 2
opening bid. Touché. While this may or may not ease this auction - it is generally poor
practice not to have a 10 trick hand when opening 2
on
the strength of a minor single suitor, thus our decision to open at the one level.
| Hand 5: | AKJ8 |
Auction: | North | East | South | West |
| Vul: N-S | Q6 |
1![]() |
Pass | 2![]() |
Pass | |
| Dlr: North | K3 |
2![]() |
Pass | 2![]() |
Pass | |
| You are: S | QJ875 |
3![]() |
Pass | ? |
| Bid | Frequency | Score |
3 ![]() |
9 | 100 |
3 ![]() |
6 | 90 |
| 3 NT | 1 | 60 |
5 ![]() |
1 | 45 |
Greg Burch: You don't known where partner is headed yet, and you are in
a forcing auction. Why not show him that you have diamond tolerance? What's the
rush to bid 3
looking for that half stopper? Partner
can do that at his next turn. That way we'll end up in 5 of the right minor
(diamonds) when partner has
x
xxx
AQJxxx
Axx.